The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monopile-induced turbulence and sediment redistribution form visible wakes in offshore wind farms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2024.1383726 |
| Authors |
Lewis P. Bailey, Robert M. Dorrell, Ina Kostakis, David McKee, Dan Parsons, Jon Rees, James Strong, Stephen Simmons, Rodney Forster |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,443,010
of 26,484,134 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#737
of 6,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,443
of 140,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#6
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,484,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,367 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.