The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geoelectrical and seismoelectric mapping of subsurface pollution in a closed landfill near the Tongo Bassa and Ngongue river, Douala Cameroon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2024.1400283 |
| Authors |
Zebaze Djuka Mba Kevin, Jidong Yang, Anatole Eugene Djieto Lordon, Jianping Huang, Clotaire José Pako Perabi, Onguene Rapheal, Kengue Ngouene Jocelyn Dirane, Mbouemboue Nsangou Moussa Ahmed |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,061,205
of 26,424,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,206
of 6,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,457
of 148,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,424,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,344 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.