↓ Skip to main content

Nanoscale pore structure in anthracite coals and its effect on methane adsorption capacity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoscale pore structure in anthracite coals and its effect on methane adsorption capacity
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/feart.2024.1413069
Authors

Qiang Xu, Ruyue Wang, Zebin Wang, Yue Zhao, Quanyun Miao, Zhengguang Zhang, Xiujia Bai, Feng Xinxin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,553,688
of 26,459,924 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,970
of 6,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,984
of 133,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#21
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,459,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.