The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Study on the formation and dewatering process of the surface filter cake of geotextile on the lateral boundary of geotextile tubes under constant flow grouting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/feart.2024.1427659 |
Authors |
Mingqiang Sheng, Qixin Zhu, Faming Huang, Chun Zou, Yang Gao, Xinxin Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,502,468
of 26,394,137 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,954
of 6,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,231
of 134,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#13
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,394,137 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.