↓ Skip to main content

Data-driven multiscale geomechanical modeling of unconventional shale gas reservoirs: a case study of Duvernay Formation, Alberta, West Canadian Basin

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data-driven multiscale geomechanical modeling of unconventional shale gas reservoirs: a case study of Duvernay Formation, Alberta, West Canadian Basin
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/feart.2024.1437255
Authors

Yue Xiao, Weidong Jiang, Chong Liang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,635,147
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,989
of 6,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,812
of 128,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#27
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.