↓ Skip to main content

Exploring geothermal resources with the CSAMT and microtremor methods: a case study in Tangquan, Jiangsu Province, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring geothermal resources with the CSAMT and microtremor methods: a case study in Tangquan, Jiangsu Province, China
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/feart.2024.1437850
Authors

Hao Xu, Xiaodong Yang, Xiangyang Cai, Ziqiao Xu, Shengzhu Liao, Xiaoping Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,484,218
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#2,948
of 6,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,787
of 137,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.