↓ Skip to main content

Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency – Benefits, Side Effects, and Risks of Growth Hormone Replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency – Benefits, Side Effects, and Risks of Growth Hormone Replacement
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2013.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary L. Reed, George R. Merriam, Atil Y. Kargi

Abstract

Deficiency of growth hormone (GH) in adults results in a syndrome characterized by decreased muscle mass and exercise capacity, increased visceral fat, impaired quality of life, unfavorable alterations in lipid profile and markers of cardiovascular risk, decrease in bone mass and integrity, and increased mortality. When dosed appropriately, GH replacement therapy (GHRT) is well tolerated, with a low incidence of side effects, and improves most of the alterations observed in GH deficiency (GHD); beneficial effects on mortality, cardiovascular events, and fracture rates, however, remain to be conclusively demonstrated. The potential of GH to act as a mitogen has resulted in concern over the possibility of increased de novo tumors or recurrence of pre-existing malignancies in individuals treated with GH. Though studies of adults who received GHRT in childhood have produced conflicting reports in this regard, long-term surveillance of adult GHRT has not demonstrated increased cancer risk or mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 19 12%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 44 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#587,906
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#123
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,154
of 289,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#2
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.