↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Concepts on Thyroid Emergencies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Concepts on Thyroid Emergencies
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2014.00102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giampaolo Papi, Salvatore Maria Corsello, Alfredo Pontecorvi

Abstract

Thyroid-related emergencies are caused by overt dysfunction of the gland which are so severe that require admission to intensive care units (ICU) frequently. Nonetheless, in the ICU setting, it is crucial to differentiate patients with non-thyroidal illness and alterations in thyroid function tests from those with intrinsic thyroid disease. This review presents and discusses the main etiopathogenetical and clinical aspects of hypothyroid coma (HC) and thyrotoxic storm (TS), including therapeutic strategy flow-charts. Furthermore, a special chapter is dedicated to the approach to massive goiter, which represents a surgical thyroid emergency.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 16%
Student > Postgraduate 18 14%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 67%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,478,013
of 26,032,395 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#1,766
of 13,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,481
of 243,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#9
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,032,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.