↓ Skip to main content

Age-Related Impairment of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Function: Pathophysiological and Cellular Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-Related Impairment of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Function: Pathophysiological and Cellular Mechanisms
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2014.00138
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo De Tata

Abstract

The incidence of type 2 diabetes significantly increases with age. The relevance of this association is dramatically magnified by the concomitant global aging of the population, but the underlying mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Here, some recent advances in this field are reviewed at the level of both the pathophysiology of glucose homeostasis and the cellular senescence of pancreatic islets. Overall, recent results highlight the crucial role of beta-cell dysfunction in the age-related impairment of pancreatic endocrine function and delineate the possibility of new original therapeutic interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,706,619
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#725
of 13,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,690
of 249,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.