↓ Skip to main content

Not All Orbitopathy Is Graves’: Discussion of Cases and Review of Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Not All Orbitopathy Is Graves’: Discussion of Cases and Review of Literature
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2017.00184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neeraja Boddu, Maliha Jumani, Vibhor Wadhwa, Gitanjali Bajaj, Fred Faas

Abstract

Graves' orbitopathy is the extra thyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease and the most common cause of exophthalmos. It is also known as thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO) as it occasionally occurs in euthyroid or hypothyroid patients with chronic thyroiditis. 5% of patients with Graves' orbitopathy can be euthyroid or hypothyroid as they have low titers of anti-thyrotropin-receptor antibodies, which are difficult to detect in some assays. Orbitopathy has also been seen in a small percentage of patients with Hashimotos thyroiditis. The eye involvement in Graves' is frequently bilateral and symmetric. These patients pose few diagnostic difficulties when the ocular findings occur concomitantly with the thyroid disease. However, when unilateral and asymmetric ocular findings occur with normal or mildly abnormal thyroid function tests, alternate etiologies should also be pursued. We aim to discuss some conditions like sarcoidosis, lymphoma, orbital pseudotumor, and orbital malignancy that mimic TAO. Three patients were referred to us with concern for Graves' orbitopathy. After further work-up, we diagnosed the first patient with specific orbital myositis from sarcoidosis. Our second patient had CD10-positive B-cell lymphoma. Our third patient had orbitopathy likely secondary to Hashimotos or orbital pseudotumor. Our cases and discussion describe some other conditions that clinically mimic TAO and the importance of pursuing further work-up for accurate diagnosis when presentation of orbitopathy is atypical.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 53%
Mathematics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#4,379
of 13,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,063
of 326,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#49
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.