The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gestational TSH and FT4 Reference Intervals in Chinese Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2018.00432 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaotong Gao, Yongze Li, Jiashu Li, Aihua Liu, Wei Sun, Weiping Teng, Zhongyan Shan |
| Abstract |
Background: Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) change dynamically during pregnancy. Differences in geographic regions, populations, and manufacturer's methodologies can affect the reference intervals for thyroid function tests. The 2017 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) recommended 4.0 mU/L as the cut-off point for the upper limit of serum TSH in early pregnancy. A systematic review is called for to establish practical, gestational-specific TSH and FT4 reference intervals for pregnant Chinese women and to explore whether the criteria are suitable for China. Methods: English and Chinese articles published from inception to Aug 2017 were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, and SCIE English-language databases and the CNKI, WanFang, and CQVIP Chinese databases. The relative descent or ascent rates of serum TSH and FT4 were calculated, after which Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2.0 software was used to analyze the data. Results: Eleven studies (6 in English and 5 in Chinese), five kits and 11,629 Chinese women from nine cities were considered in this meta-analysis. Compared with the reference ranges provided by manufacturers, serum TSH decreased in the first trimester, with the upper limit declining by 21.7% (5.0-36.6%), to a value close to 4.0 mU/L, and the lower limit declining by 85.7% (73.5-97.1%). It continued decreasing in the second trimester, with the upper limit declining by 24.0% (6.4-40.9%) and the lower limit declining by 40.7% (9.0-85.7%). For FT4, the upper limit fluctuated slightly, and the lower limit increased by 6.8% (1.0-14.6%) in the first trimester. Serum FT4 dropped gradually, with the upper limit declining by 21.8% (2.5-31.8%) and the lower limit declining by 12.7% (2.6-19.6%) in the second trimester. During the third trimester, the upper limit decreased by 25.1% (12.7-35.0%), while the lower limit decreased by 20.9% (14.8-27.3%). Conclusions: Various regions, kits and test methods affect the gestational TSH and FT4 levels. The non-pregnant serum TSH upper limit minus 22% is very close to 4.0 mU/L, which can be used as a sub-optimal approach to represent the cut-off value for pregnant Chinese women in the first trimester. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 43% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,653,740
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#6,046
of 13,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,897
of 345,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#113
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.