You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity of Dietary Assessment Methods When Compared to the Method of Doubly Labeled Water: A Systematic Review in Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2019.00850 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy L. Burrows, Yan Yee Ho, Megan E. Rollo, Clare E. Collins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 15% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,755,518
of 26,080,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#778
of 13,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,481
of 470,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#25
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.