↓ Skip to main content

Iodine Supplementation in Mildly Iodine-Deficient Pregnant Women Does Not Improve Maternal Thyroid Function or Child Development: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iodine Supplementation in Mildly Iodine-Deficient Pregnant Women Does Not Improve Maternal Thyroid Function or Child Development: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2020.572984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole J. E. Verhagen, Sueppong Gowachirapant, Pattanee Winichagoon, Maria Andersson, Alida Melse-Boonstra, Michael B. Zimmermann

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Researcher 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 55 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 56 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#6,848,500
of 26,227,947 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#1,922
of 13,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,603
of 439,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#68
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,227,947 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.