You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Molecular Characterization of an Aquaporin−2 Mutation Causing Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2021.665145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qian Li, Bichao Lu, Jia Yang, Chao Li, Yanchun Li, Hui Chen, Naishi Li, Lian Duan, Feng Gu, Jianmin Zhang, Weibo Xia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,378,828
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,357
of 13,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,490
of 436,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#153
of 458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.