The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Protocol for a Pan-Canadian Prospective Observational Study on Active Surveillance or Surgery for Very Low Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2021.686996 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna M. Sawka, Sangeet Ghai, George Tomlinson, Nancy N. Baxter, Martin Corsten, Syed Ali Imran, Eric Bissada, Rebecca Lebouef, Nathalie Audet, Maryse Brassard, Han Zhang, Michael Gupta, Anthony C. Nichols, Deric Morrison, Stephanie Johnson-Obeski, Eitan Prisman, Don Anderson, Shamir P. Chandarana, Sana Ghaznavi, Jennifer Jones, Amiram Gafni, John J. Matelski, Wei Xu, David P. Goldstein, the Canadian Thyroid Cancer Active Surveillance Study Group, Lorne Rotstein, Dale Brown, John de Almeida, Patrick Gullane, Ralph Gilbert, Douglas Chepeha, Jonathan Irish, Jesse Pasterna, Shereen Ezzat, James P. Brierley, Richard W. Tsang, Eric Monteiro, Afshan Zahedi, Jacqueline Jame, Karen Gomez Hernandez, Antoine Eskander, Danny Enepekides, Kevin Higgins, Ilana J. Halperin, Afshan Zahedi, Karen Devon, Everton Gooden, Manish Shah, Mark Korman, Janet Chung, Kareem Nazarali, Eric Arruda, Artur Gevorgyan, Michael Chang, Sumeet Anand, Vinay Fernandes, Denny Lin, Avik Banerjee, Vinita Bindlish, Vinod Bharadwaj, Maky Hafidh, Raewyn Seaburg, Laura Whiteacre |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Researcher | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#23,487,873
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#8,673
of 13,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#397,008
of 462,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#279
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.