The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploration and validation of a combined immune and metabolism gene signature for prognosis prediction of colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2022.1069528 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yitai Xiao, Guixiong Zhang, Lizhu Wang, Mingzhu Liang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,114,307
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,124
of 13,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,503
of 498,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#169
of 953 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 953 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.