↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Is there a role for diabetes-specific nutrition formulas as meal replacements in type 2 diabetes?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: Is there a role for diabetes-specific nutrition formulas as meal replacements in type 2 diabetes?
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2022.1094954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea J. Glenn, Simin Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#16,338,682
of 26,246,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,812
of 13,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,725
of 487,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#224
of 988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,246,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.