↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Assessment of osteoporotic fractures and risk prediction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Assessment of osteoporotic fractures and risk prediction
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2022.1107678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoguang Cheng, Zhi-Feng Sheng, Xiangbing Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,591,909
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#6,004
of 13,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,822
of 490,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#381
of 1,001 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,001 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.