The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Ankle-Brachial Index Is Independently Associated With Cardiovascular Outcomes and Foot Ulcers in Asian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2022.878492 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ming-Chi Yang, Yu-Yao Huang, Sheng-Hwu Hsieh, Jui-Hung Sun, Chih-Ching Wang, Chia-Hung Lin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 60% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 70% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,639,484
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#2,262
of 13,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,972
of 455,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#120
of 715 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 715 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.