The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine in regulating gut-derived 5-HT for osteoporosis treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2023.1234683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Sun, Yincang Wang, Jiazhe Du, Yujie Wang, Bo Liu, Xiaodong Li, Xiaofeng Zhang, Xilin Xu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#21,328,996
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#7,063
of 13,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,736
of 368,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#300
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.