The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The role of primary cilia in thyroid diseases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2023.1306550 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zijiao Tian, Xinlin Li, Xue Yu, Shuxin Yan, Jingwei Sun, Wenxin Ma, Xiaoyun Zhu, Yang Tang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,509,972
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,314
of 13,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,886
of 375,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#84
of 650 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 650 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.