The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case report: Insulinomatosis: description of four sporadic cases and review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2023.1308662 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Delmar Muniz Lourenço, Maria Lucia Corrêa-Giannella, Sheila Aparecida Coelho Siqueira, Marcia Nery, Flavio Galvão Ribeiro, Elizangela Pereira de Souza Quedas, Manoel de Souza Rocha, Ramon Marcelino do Nascimento, Maria Adelaide Albergaria Pereira |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,386,400
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,260
of 13,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,869
of 389,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#82
of 653 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 653 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.