The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of genetically determined chronotype with circulating testosterone: a Mendelian randomization study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2024.1264410 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomohiro Ichikawa, Takuro Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Yoshihiro Ikehata, Shuji Isotani, Hisamitsu Ide, Shigeo Horie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,767,513
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#6,109
of 13,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,257
of 337,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#116
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.