You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring during exercise-related hypoglycemia in individuals with type 1 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2024.1352829 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaisar Maytham, Per G. Hagelqvist, Susanne Engberg, Julie L. Forman, Ulrik Pedersen-Bjergaard, Filip K. Knop, Tina Vilsbøll, Andreas Andersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Hungary | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,224,969
of 26,083,840 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#3,735
of 13,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,556
of 324,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#67
of 308 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,083,840 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 308 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.