↓ Skip to main content

Clinical characteristics and long-term management for patients with vitamin D-dependent rickets type II: a retrospective study at a single center in Saudi Arabia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical characteristics and long-term management for patients with vitamin D-dependent rickets type II: a retrospective study at a single center in Saudi Arabia
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2024.1365714
Pubmed ID
Authors

Afaf Alsagheir, Abdullah Al-Ashwal, Amal Binladen, Raghad Alhuthil, Faisal Joueidi, Khushnooda Ramzan, Faiqa Imtiaz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,866,085
of 26,170,906 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#5,488
of 13,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,375
of 221,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#45
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.