You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Associations of different dietary patterns, bone mineral density, and fracture risk among elderly women: the China Osteoporosis Prevalence Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2024.1378158 |
| Authors |
Nan Zhao, Xiangjun Yin, Lin Chen, Shunyu Tang, Hua Lin, Lu Cui, Xiaolan Jin, Zhongjian Xie, Ning Jiang, Lijia Cui, Wei Yu, Steven R. Cummings, Linhong Wang, Weibo Xia |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#23,547,552
of 26,219,305 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#8,777
of 13,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,645
of 213,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#64
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,219,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.