The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The circadian syndrome is a better predictor for psoriasis than the metabolic syndrome via an explainable machine learning method — the NHANES survey during 2005–2006 and 2009–2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in endocrinology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fendo.2024.1379130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yunfan Gu, Xinglan Ye, Wenting Zhao, Shiwei He, Weiming Zhang, Xianyu Zeng |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,132,110
of 26,552,644 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#1,630
of 13,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,255
of 309,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#25
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.