↓ Skip to main content

Potential association between arsenic and vitamin D

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential association between arsenic and vitamin D
Published in
Frontiers in endocrinology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fendo.2024.1430980
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mythri Chittilla, Chantal Uzoma, Desiree Brewer, Mohammed S. Razzaque

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,619,528
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in endocrinology
#7,345
of 13,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,829
of 257,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in endocrinology
#94
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.