You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Three Way Comparison of Hydrophilic Ionic Liquid, Hydrophobic Ionic Liquid, and Dilute Acid for the Pretreatment of Herbaceous and Woody Biomass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Energy Research, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00067 |
| Authors |
C. Luke Williams, Chenlin Li, Hongqiang Hu, Jared C. Allen, Brad J. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Energy | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#751
of 3,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,186
of 326,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,333 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.