↓ Skip to main content

Study on the Calculation Method of Molten Pool Decay Heat Distribution under IVR Condition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Energy Research, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study on the Calculation Method of Molten Pool Decay Heat Distribution under IVR Condition
Published in
Frontiers in Energy Research, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2021.677865
Authors

Yisheng Hao, Junyi Chen, Hao Luo, Xiaoyu Guo, Minyun Liu, Shanfang Huang, Kan Wang, Houjun Gong, Yang Li, Yuwen Hu, Chuan Lu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#20,707,815
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#1,332
of 3,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#368,896
of 448,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#104
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.