↓ Skip to main content

A Fundamental Moving Boundary Problem of 1D Commingled Preferential Darcian Flow and Non-Darcian Flow Through Dual-Layered Porous Media

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Energy Research, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Fundamental Moving Boundary Problem of 1D Commingled Preferential Darcian Flow and Non-Darcian Flow Through Dual-Layered Porous Media
Published in
Frontiers in Energy Research, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2022.941605
Authors

Ping Wang, Wenchao Liu, Wei Ding, Xiangwen Kong, Hailiang Fan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,861,471
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#1,353
of 3,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,050
of 432,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#52
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.