The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Holistic evaluation of aircraft detection lighting systems for wind turbines in Germany using a multi-method evaluation framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Energy Research, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenrg.2022.984003 |
Authors |
Paul Weigel, Peter Viebahn, Manfred Fischedick |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 33% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
Energy | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,966,153
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#122
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,487
of 434,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#5
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.