↓ Skip to main content

Effect of disturbed coal pore structure on gas adsorption characteristics: mercury intrusion porosimetry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Energy Research, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of disturbed coal pore structure on gas adsorption characteristics: mercury intrusion porosimetry
Published in
Frontiers in Energy Research, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1333686
Authors

Yunpei Liang, Wanjie Sun, Zhaopeng Wu, Shuren Mao, Qican Ran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,499,559
of 26,390,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#996
of 4,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,407
of 379,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#56
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,390,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.