The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thermodynamic and structural characterization of high-entropy garnet electrolytes for all-solid-state battery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Energy Research, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1393914 |
| Authors |
Yin-Ying Ting, Ruijie Ye, Enkhtsetseg Dashjav, Qianli Ma, Sou Taminato, Daisuke Mori, Nobuyuki Imanishi, Martin Finsterbusch, Michael H. Eikerling, Olivier Guillon, Payam Kaghazchi, Piotr M. Kowalski |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,480,294
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#452
of 4,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,504
of 155,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them