↓ Skip to main content

Retraction: Current developments in catalytic methanation of carbon dioxide-a review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Energy Research, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction: Current developments in catalytic methanation of carbon dioxide-a review
Published in
Frontiers in Energy Research, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1446761
Authors

Frontiers Editorial Office

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,856,409
of 26,176,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#223
of 4,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,954
of 152,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#1
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,714 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.