↓ Skip to main content

Safe and Sustainable Traditional Production: The Water Buffalo in Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safe and Sustainable Traditional Production: The Water Buffalo in Asia
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00038
Authors

Gautam K. Deb, Talukder N. Nahar, Peregrino G. Duran, Giorgio A. Presicce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 20%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,076,642
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#985
of 4,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,535
of 340,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.