The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic Review of the Effects of Chemical Insecticides on Four Common Butterfly Families
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00032 |
| Authors |
Rosaria Mulé, Giorgio Sabella, Lavinia Robba, Barbara Manachini |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,101,471
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#581
of 3,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,790
of 314,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.