The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Commentary: Evaluating the Role of Seagrass in Cenozoic CO2 Variations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00055 |
Authors |
Peter I. Macreadie, Oscar Serrano, Carlos M. Duarte, John Beardall, Damien Maher |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
Australia | 4 | 18% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 9% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 3 | 23% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,702,725
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#279
of 4,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,038
of 328,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.