↓ Skip to main content

Response: Commentary: Evaluating the Role of Seagrass in Cenozoic CO2 Variations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response: Commentary: Evaluating the Role of Seagrass in Cenozoic CO2 Variations
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00074
Authors

Marco Brandano, Luis Pomar, Guillem Mateu-Vicens, Marco Cuffaro, Giovanni Gaglianone, Patrizio Petricca, Vincenzo Stagno

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Environmental Science 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,026
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,158
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,605
of 331,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.