↓ Skip to main content

Rationally Managed Pastures Stock More Carbon than No-Tillage Fields

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationally Managed Pastures Stock More Carbon than No-Tillage Fields
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, December 2017
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00087
Authors

Hizumi L. S. Seó, Luiz C. P. Machado Filho, Daniel Brugnara

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 45%
Environmental Science 7 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,660,072
of 26,402,896 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#654
of 4,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,969
of 453,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,402,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.