You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Key Questions for Next-Generation Biomonitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00197 |
| Authors |
Andreas Makiola, Zacchaeus G. Compson, Donald J. Baird, Matthew A. Barnes, Sam P. Boerlijst, Agnès Bouchez, Georgina Brennan, Alex Bush, Elsa Canard, Tristan Cordier, Simon Creer, R. Allen Curry, Patrice David, Alex J. Dumbrell, Dominique Gravel, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Brian Hayden, Berry van der Hoorn, Philippe Jarne, J. Iwan Jones, Battle Karimi, Francois Keck, Martyn Kelly, Ineke E. Knot, Louie Krol, Francois Massol, Wendy A. Monk, John Murphy, Jan Pawlowski, Timothée Poisot, Teresita M. Porter, Kate C. Randall, Emma Ransome, Virginie Ravigné, Alan Raybould, Stephane Robin, Maarten Schrama, Bertrand Schatz, Alireza Tamaddoni-Nezhad, Krijn B. Trimbos, Corinne Vacher, Valentin Vasselon, Susie Wood, Guy Woodward, David A. Bohan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 46 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 60 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,000,482
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#201
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,365
of 482,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.