↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of a Low Volume Extraction Method to Determine Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Aerosol Samples

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of a Low Volume Extraction Method to Determine Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Aerosol Samples
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.742251
Authors

Caroline Scaramboni, Jordan Brizi Neris, Rita de Kássia Silva do Nascimento, Natasha Leandra Chiaranda da Rosa, Jonatas Schadeck Carvalho, Guilherme Martins Grosseli, Maria Lucia Arruda Moura Campos, Pedro Sérgio Fadini, Roberta Cerasi Urban

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 41%
Environmental Science 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,296
of 3,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,257
of 440,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#73
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.