↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in the Evaluation of Observational Data Trustworthiness From a Data Producers Viewpoint (FAIR+)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges in the Evaluation of Observational Data Trustworthiness From a Data Producers Viewpoint (FAIR+)
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.772666
Authors

Uta Koedel, Claudia Schuetze, Philipp Fischer, Ingeborg Bussmann, Philip K. Sauer, Erik Nixdorf, Thomas Kalbacher, Viktoria Wichert, Diana Rechid, Laurens M. Bouwer, Peter Dietrich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 15%
Computer Science 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,427,593
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,990
of 3,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410,887
of 499,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#140
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.