You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Restoring Rivers and Floodplains for Habitat and Flood Risk Reduction: Experiences in Multi-Benefit Floodplain Management From California and Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2021.778568 |
| Authors |
Anna Serra-Llobet, Sonja C. Jähnig, Juergen Geist, G. Mathias Kondolf, Christian Damm, Mathias Scholz, Jay Lund, Jeff J. Opperman, Sarah M. Yarnell, Anitra Pawley, Eileen Shader, John Cain, Aude Zingraff-Hamed, Theodore E. Grantham, William Eisenstein, Rafael Schmitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 63 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#370,412
of 25,128,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#31
of 4,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,224
of 437,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#4
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,128,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.