The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variation in the VLF signal noise amplitude during the period of intense seismic activity in Central Italy from 25 October to 3 November 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1005575 |
| Authors |
Aleksandra Nina, Pier Francesco Biagi, Sergey Pulinets, Giovanni Nico, Srđan T. Mitrović, Vladimir M. Čadež, Milan Radovanović, Marko Urošev, Luka Č. Popović |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,648,150
of 26,238,332 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,241
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,646
of 442,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#106
of 478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,332 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.