The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of air quality on enterprise productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1095393 |
Authors |
Su Liu, Yuetao Yang, Ling Cai |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 40% |
Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,507,245
of 25,976,786 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#501
of 4,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,436
of 482,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#15
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,976,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 482,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.