↓ Skip to main content

In-Situ Test Method for Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Water Flowing Around Piles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-Situ Test Method for Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Water Flowing Around Piles
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.855334
Authors

Mingwei Liu, Liqin Zeng, Linjian Wu, Gang Chen, Lilong Shen, Erdi Abi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#20,761,844
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#2,040
of 3,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,555
of 440,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#220
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,652 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.