↓ Skip to main content

Varying performance of eight evapotranspiration products with aridity and vegetation greenness across the globe

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Varying performance of eight evapotranspiration products with aridity and vegetation greenness across the globe
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1079520
Authors

Hongzhou Wang, Xiaodong Li, Cheng Tong, Yongkang Xu, Dongjun Lin, Jiazhi Wang, Fei Yao, Pengxuan Zhu, Guixia Yan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,851,754
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#2,059
of 3,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,496
of 247,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#53
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.