↓ Skip to main content

Industrial steam consumption analysis and prediction based on multi-source sensing data for sustainable energy development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Industrial steam consumption analysis and prediction based on multi-source sensing data for sustainable energy development
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1187201
Authors

Mingxia Yang, Xiaojie Xu, Huayan Cheng, Zhidan Zhan, Zhongshen Xu, Lianghuai Tong, Kai Fang, Ahmedin M. Ahmed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,205,114
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#1,821
of 4,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,114
of 395,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#83
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.