↓ Skip to main content

A review of Global Carbon Markets from Kyoto to Paris and beyond: the persistent failure of implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of Global Carbon Markets from Kyoto to Paris and beyond: the persistent failure of implementation
Published in
Frontiers in Environmental Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368105
Authors

Majid Asadnabizadeh, Espen Moe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,168,452
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#326
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,975
of 150,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Environmental Science
#4
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.